Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
A close analysis of news, current affairs, politics and social trends..... This is the world as you've never known it...Want to wake up with the Critic ?

When is a Cousin First Removed?

December 27th 2008 01:36


Genealogy relationships can be very confusing. What are second cousins, third cousins or even a cousin first removed?

I have never really understood the definitions beyond first cousins. Even after meeting relatives who are more distantly related than that, I have ever really explored the links, quite content in the knowledge that they are related in some way.


The subject of family relations, cousins, second cousins and lines came up at our family gathering on Christmas Day. It was prompted of course by the fact that our (extended) family had grown this year with the addition of three babies.

The discussion led to us trying to work out what relationship my siblings’ children were to our cousins’ children. Were they second or third cousins? What exactly is a "cousin first removed"?

We all had differing ideas on this and after tossing all our views into the discussion none of us were any the wiser and probably even more confused. This prompted me to do a little investigation into the subject myself.

This is what I learned. My cousins, my siblings and I share the same grandparents. Their children and mine would share the same great grandparents. So my children would be their children’s second cousins. Their children’s children would be my children’s children’s third cousins and so it goes down the line.

My grandparents would be my cousins’ children’s great grandparents so I am a cousin first removed to my cousins’ children. Generally this would distinguish the different generations that I and my cousins’ children belong to. Once removed means one generation difference. Twice removed is two and so on.


If you are intereted in finding out more on the subject, I found the following few sites that also have some pretty good charts pretty helpful Mind you, I think I would need to carry them with me to work out any relationship further down the line than that.

Really Long Link

Really Long Link

Image courtesy of Science News







109
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
12 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by alt_ed

December 27th 2008 03:52
haha Janet, this still sounds far to confusing for me to figure out! Plus, my family is HUGE!!!

Interesting topic though

Comment by Janet Collins

December 27th 2008 04:26
Hey alt_ed

Yes my family is reasonably large too but I just haven't bothered to look into this before.

Thanks for the comment and my wishes for a great New Year.

Comment by Waysouth

December 27th 2008 17:11
I know exactly who all my cousins are, I love whipping out the family relationships (I'm originally from a rural area, and we are all related)

Your explanation sounds spot on, but I like to use the visual graphics (han't seen your links yet).

All I know is, my first cousins are the children of my mother or father's sisters and brothers. The next generation down is second cousins. (their grandparent and my grandparent were siblings, as opposed to our parents)

And then if there is a difference in generations, they are first removed, second removed, etc. the children of the second cousin is second cousin once removed.

I don't figure it out often, though, I have a lot of them memorized, all my first cousins and once removed in each direction. The hard part is when steps and in-laws come into the picture.

Comment by Janet Collins

December 28th 2008 02:10
Waysouth

I think I might leave out the steps and in-laws for the moment. The others are confusing enough to me. The links in my post have some great charts that make it a lot easier to understand.

Thank you for visiting.

Janet

Comment by Anonymous

December 28th 2008 07:26
Janet,Like all your articles I found this particularly interesting. I never really thought too much about this myself. However Christmas is a really relevant time to confront this subject. Especially on Christmas day when meeting all your rellies your child turns around to you and says "Who is Emily anyway?".

There is a distant "cousin" in Tasmania who is my husband's sister's son's illegitimate daughter who has been warmly "received" into the family and has instantly become my daughters close relative. But I have failed to explain how she is related as I have been totally confused about this for years. Congratulations, Janet, for tackling such a complicated subject

Comment by Janet Collins

December 28th 2008 13:46
Thank you Anon

I imagine for those who take up genealogy it gets very interesting but when you know very little on the subject it certainly is compicated.

Comment by Morgan Bell

December 29th 2008 08:37
then youve gotta include all the steps, halves, adopted, and defacto children!

Comment by colocountry

December 29th 2008 10:19
Janet,
You're messing with my mind on this one!!!! Whenever the matriarchs of my family start talking about family history, they invariably start indulging in the ancient language of belonging that has been shrouded in secrecy for several generations. It is like going to a government meeting without your acronym handbook!! AAAAHH!! Even those who seem most articulate dont seem to have a handle on who is who in the family! Now, Im only a tad smarter than the average idiot but, I dont get it!
Col

Comment by Janet Collins

December 29th 2008 13:33
Morgan,

Haha, but one thing at a time. I'm quite pleased I've gone this far.

Comment by Janet Collins

December 29th 2008 13:37
Col

It is a bit like that. And that's with the traditional family lines. As Morgan points out you then go into the halves,steps, etc. I haven't delved that far yet.

Comment by Samantha Elley

December 30th 2008 10:58
Janet - THANKYOU so much for explaining that. I am an avid family historian but have always steered clear of the 'removed' term as it was just too hard.

Comment by Janet Collins

December 30th 2008 11:13
Samantha,

I am still pretty confused about it all but I have learned a bit more through my research. The "removed" term was always baffling to me too.

Thanks for the visit.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
3 Posts
2 Posts
374 Posts dating from November 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Janet Collins's Blogs

4665 Vote(s)
231 Comment(s)
29 Post(s)
129 Vote(s)
1 Comment(s)
1 Post(s)
Moderated by Janet Collins
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]