Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
A close analysis of news, current affairs, politics and social trends..... This is the world as you've never known it...Want to wake up with the Critic ?

Airlines Charge for Excess Body Weight

April 17th 2009 06:06


Airlines have always charged us for excess baggage weight and we all accept that but an American airline this week is introducing a new policy that will often force obese people to pay for two seats rather than one.

United Airlines has come under strong criticism for the new policy which will compel overweight people to pay for two tickets on busy routes. If a person can’t fit into one seat, they say, they will just have to fork out the money for two.



The move is due to come into effect this week but campaigners are calling it “blatant discrimination” and believe the problem is not that the passengers are too big but that the seats are too small.

United Airlines has defended its new policy saying that there are already eight other airlines doing the same. The airline claims to have had 700 complaints last year from passengers who were squashed into only part of a seat because of an overweight person next to them.

The new policy, they say, allows a steward to try to find two adjacent spare seats for larger people but if the aircraft is full, the passenger will be asked to get off and board another flight and pay for two tickets.

Under the new policy, staff will be expected to move passengers if they are unable to lower the arm rest and buckle a seatbelt with one additional extension cord

United Airlines defended its new policy on the basis that it is solely for the comfort and well-being of all their passengers.



Source: www.news.com
Image Credit: www.skynews.com



241
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
118 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Wilson Pon

April 17th 2009 08:02
This is really an idiot way to charge the passengers here, Janet. Would this mean that the pregnant women also have to be charged for overweight as well?

Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 17th 2009 10:26
Next time I fly I'll be asking for half-price - an ugly reduction fee due to the shockers of hosties they have on flights.

Comment by Journeywoman

April 17th 2009 10:30
Personally I think it's about time! Have you ever had to sit next to an obese person on a plane? You really are forced into a small part of your own seat and it's very uncomfortable. If someone's weight problem causes issues for other people, then yes, I think it's their responsibility to pay for an extra seat.

We don't put up with other forms of unhealthiness that encroach on others (e.g. smoking on planes) - why should we have to pander to the obese?

Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 17th 2009 11:07
I bet they don't give anorexics and bulimics discounted fares.

Comment by colocountry

April 17th 2009 12:29
Janet,
I once caught a jFokker from Cairns to Weipa in 1970. My compatriot on that flight was a Thursday Islander who probably weighed 18 stone, or 200 kilos. I was on the window seat and spent the entire time splattered against the window. I gained a very personal view of the terrain below but I lved in dire fear that he would yawn!! Mind you, I came to admire these islanders for their their music and their resilience.
Col

Comment by Janet Collins

April 17th 2009 13:31
Wilson

I presume that because a pregnant woman's extra weight is out in front it wouldn't encroach on the neighboouring seat so it wouldn't be a problem

Seriously though, it does seem rather cruel and could be pretty embarrassing for some.

Comment by Janet Collins

April 17th 2009 13:34
LHM

You make a very interesting point. Should skinny people get a discount? I guess they would have to be skinny enough to only take up half a seat and there would have to be another skinny person to share the other half. Otherwise the airlines probably wouldn't be able to afford to discount them

Comment by Janet Collins

April 17th 2009 13:37
Journeywoman

I've never experienced any difficulties when I have travelled. I get more offended by a neighbour traveller having BO or a baby crying the whole trip.

The policy does seem rather severe to me though but I guess if others are going to suffer great discomfort then.....

Thanks for the visit.

Comment by Janet Collins

April 17th 2009 13:39
Col

Ahaha! That experience has certainly stayed with you a long time. Travelling stories are usually some of the best.

Thanks for the visit.

Comment by Whitney

April 17th 2009 14:57
I told a friend of mine about this, and his question is "do they get two meals?" Anyone know?

Comment by Morgan Bell

April 17th 2009 15:01
oh crying babies are far worse!

i dont know what the seating is like on United Airlines, but if its anything like Virgin Blue or Jetstar or Qantas economy the airline is probably creating the problem by designing the interior of the plane to be like a sardine can . . . im 6 foot tall and i usually have to put my legs to the side because there is so little room between me and the person in front, i dont know how tall men, like basketballers or those in the 6'4" to 7 foot range, fit in at all

although i imagine people that are so morbidly obese they cannot fit into the width of a seat would (could) be classified as disabled, and it would be much better customer service if the airline treated them as so and just allocated them more room free of charge, as they would for anyone with mobility issues or a carer or guide etc . . . i wonder if it is an everyday occurance to have such a large person?

Comment by Janet Collins

April 17th 2009 15:07
Whitney

Hahaha! Good point. I hadn't thought of that. I would think that at the least if someone paid for two tickets they would certainly be entitled to two meals. We'll have to take this up with United Airlines because they surely couldn't get away with only giving them one

Comment by Janet Collins

April 17th 2009 15:10
Morgan

You always come up with creative alternatives. And you are right. The airlines could possibly come up with some solution by designing the seating better. They allow for other things like babies, etc.

Comment by Whitney

April 17th 2009 15:12
Janet, that's what I told him. If they're paying for two seats, how can they deny them?

The airline should at least give them half off the second seat.

Comment by Janet Collins

April 17th 2009 15:38
That's also a good point, Whitney, because they are not in effect taking up two complete seats. Just more than one. So maybe the deal should be one-and-a-half

Thanks again for the really valuable comment.

Comment by Postmodern Critic

April 17th 2009 18:40
I think they should make some extra large seats at the back or something. That would solve everything...

As for getting two meals - would you really want them, as airline food is mostly unappetising?

Comment by Lilla

April 17th 2009 21:13
Hi Janet,

I*m going to risk the chaffing this comment may cause and say I applaud United*s decision!

I also agree with the two meal policy as the gluttens amongst us would relish the opportunity, and I think discounts on half price seats for the underweight people is also a great incventive to stop people from the madness that is *affluence* today.

Hahahah I like Epiph*s idea, they could call it : *Glutton Class*

Lilla ..

Comment by Postmodern Critic

April 17th 2009 21:42
Lilla - How terribly rude. Obese people get enough stigma from society without you adding to it by calling them names in the spirit of a mean child. I don't enjoy your comments so I wish you wouldn't reference mine like we're pals or something.

Comment by Tracy

April 17th 2009 21:50
I think it's a hard one. I agree with the suggestion to have a section with a few larger seats for those who are bigger, taller or generally need more room. It's subtle and takes care of the situation.

Comment by Lilla

April 17th 2009 21:55
Dear PMC, (excuse me Janet) . .

Why don*t you mind your own business. I will be judged as I write and if you don*t like it, too bad. I doubt anyone could mistake us as *on the same page.* Really, your reaction is so childish as to make me incredulous with wonder at its purility and bias, considering it was your suggestion. There is no secret that gluttony in US and OZ is at an all time high. Go and google some statistics on the problems this epidemic of a lack of self control is causing families, not to mention widowed spouses and orphaned children; and the consequences of social services now looking into grossly obese children being seen as child abuse and invoking the right to take them away from mothers who cannot care for them properly. What are you thinking? Your bile at me only heightens the hypocrisy of your true concern for these obviously sick people.

I think anything that encourages those who are genuinely suffering from gluttony to become aware of their problem (like an alcoholic has to) and learn to control it; is a blessing in my eyes and I am entitled to my opinion, whether you like it or not. Bloggers generally understand that blogging is all about offering opinions, especially blogs like Janets who call for all manner of people to come forward and offer theirs on social situations of our time. It is a forum E, not a dictatoriship for the brainwashed, okay? Now if that means that you wouldn*t hang out with me in the real world, so be it, but please don*t try and gag me on orble.

Obesity (like gambling or drinking) is a disease of the times and needs some measures of control. Pandering to those who have lost control by allowing them to continue to think it is okay is not only purile, it is cruel in the extreme especially to those who have lost control of their eating habits and force their children to the same extremes.

As a social critic commentator I say again I applaud united*s decision to start to try and do something about it, to make people realise that there is a problem to start with, as well as trying to sort the issue of *normal sized* people having to pay for those who have lost their waist size ~ supporting it, as it were.

I see United*s decision as a positive step forward to helping gluttony and those caught in its grips, to wake up to the fact that they are out of control and that they need to take that control back. I think this move sends out a positive shock wave of empowerment to overwight people everywhere.

To me it is the same as US, UK and some OZ surgeons refusing to do heart transplants on those who continue to smoke ciggarettes. I agree with them too, would you call me mean spirited for that also?

Grow up Epiphanie, your opinion is not the only one and attacking those with different views is not an effective way of getting your point on why you feel I am mean spirited by holding my opinion . . other than its brevity because I am rushed for time sometimes as I have a real life, but again my commetn was based on yours, so I would rather hear why you feel it is mean spirited to call a shovel a shovel?

I have to go and get ready to go to work now, excuse me.

Lilla . .

Comment by RubySoho

April 17th 2009 22:31
The seats are too small? That's new. Don't know how I feel about this but to suggest that airlines make all their seats bigger is pretty silly. Most of us can fit in pretty comfortably. And quite frankly the idea alarms me. Like the big pair of pants that gradually become tighter fitting, would we all grow into them eventually?

Comment by Morgan Bell

April 17th 2009 23:00
Ruby, i want my extra 2 inches of leg room!

i know im not gunna get it, they will probably just keep decreasing the leg room until you (well i) have to sit with my knees tucked up under my chin . . . im thinking about selling some organs online so i can fly first class everywhere i go

i think we do get bigger (taller) on average as a species with each passing year

Comment by Carolyn Cordon

April 18th 2009 00:48
I am so glad I'm a 'not tall person'. Five foot nothing, and proud of it!

Comment by Janet Collins

April 18th 2009 04:04
Thanks for all the comments guys.

PM: I think airlines would be too stingy to install a few larger seats. It may lose them a ticket or two.

Lilla: You did say you would risk the chaffing you would get over the comment. Two airline meals would hardly go into the "glutton" category surely. Last time I had one, there was hardly anything there

Tracy: I think it would make sense too but as I said to PM they would be reluctant to lose but one ticket by doing this.

Ruby: I've never found it a problem either but obviously some travellers have. Maybe it's just that on the whole people are getting larger.

Morgan: This is one area where a tall person has a disadvantage. I'm pretty average and even so, my legs are quite short in comparison so I never have the problem of not enough leg room.

Caroline: Opposite to Morgan I see. For travelling comfort, small and short is good. Trying to get some attention though can cause problems don't you think. Tall people always seem to be able to get people's attention

Comment by RubySoho

April 18th 2009 05:01
Hey Morgan, I meant bigger as in wider, not bigger as in taller. Hey, I'm only 166cms tall (I refuse to use inches, if metric is good enough for Star Trek, it's good enough for me), and I could use more leg room.

But make seats wider? No way. It'll only encourage an unhealthy lifestyle*. And it'll drive up prices and that makes it unfair on the rest of us.

Yes, I know some larger people are actually healthy. But no-one can claim that anyone who is too big to fit into a plane seat is anywhere near healthy.

Comment by the world of gaye

April 18th 2009 07:45
I can't make up my mind about this one. Every time someone is insulted now they scream discrimination but if your fat your fat and you can't deny it. I am, shall we say on the chubby side but not nearly the size of some of the people I imagine they are talking about. It is uncomfortable sitting next to an obese person, and they do impose on other people's space. That is the truth wether it is offensive or not. But I don't believe in humiliating another human being so I think this should be handled with a bit of compassion. As far as the Airlines making extra money out of it, why not. They are just another in a long line of greedy corporations who will do whatever they can for a few extra dollars.

Comment by Mountain Fog

April 18th 2009 12:44
what abooot triple decker hammocks?
then the hosties could 'stack em and rack em', everyone flies lying flat on their backs, and if they need a feed, they hit the 'stand' button, which revolves them to the floor position and walk to the feed bar...
so, BIGGER planes flying much less, so they are always full, and everyone flies on their back....I can feel an advertising jingle coming on...

flat back it on QANTAS!

and on a more serious note...

I wish to point out that a lot of obesity is also created by circumstances and the food industry. Lack of time to prepare, sit and eat well, and the abundance of cheap fast food outlets everywhere, has added to this, and more importantly, the use of trans fats and highly refined white flour has also added to it, exhausting the pancreas to the point it cannot produce insulin anymore.

I worked my guts out when employed by the film industry, 100 hour weeks were a regular, and carting, lifting and driving trucks and running everywhere carrying loads of crap was the usual order of the day, yet, I put on weight, because the only food choices I had were fast, and by the time I got home, by 11pm more often than not, and then getting up at 4am the next day, left me with no energy, time, nor inclination to cook, let alone buy food to do it with.

Obesity has many mothers..... it is not just simply some poor, emotionally crippled people eating themselves to death. The notion that it is all their fault is as simplistic and insulting as it is erroneous, and devoid of a compassionate and balanced viewpoint.

(you can tell I have nothing creative in my head for my own blog, waisting all this energy here...)

Anyway, in closing, why not create a fat person plane service? All seats are jumbo, as are meals, and hosties too!

Call the airline:

ELEPHANT AIR

: where jumbos fly jumbos in peace!

Another advertising idea...

JUMBO AIR...the airline where we can truthfully say...
PIGS CAN FLY!!



tee hee
fog

Comment by Janet Collins

April 18th 2009 19:06
Ruby: We all knew what you meant

Gaye: Yes, it is a tough one. On the one hand you could think United Airlines were being pretty shameless and nasty. On the other, you could think it is only fair really because if someone is really all that large, they cannot expect to have two seats at a busy time for the price of one. It still seems a bit harsh to me.

Fog: Travelling flat on triple decker hammocks...love it. Hahaha - such imagination. It reminded me of travels in my younger years when there was a bus tour around Europe that people called "the coffin tours". It wasn't a bus really. It was a hugh truck of a sort where the beds were like drawers. Apparently, it was a cheap way to see Europe!

Your suggestion of a fat plane service was a good one too. Why not? There are special services for practically everything else

Thanks everyone.

Comment by Mistersmith

April 18th 2009 22:32
Very amusing - especially Fog's comments. But what's with PMC? No fat jokes? Where will it end?

Comment by Postmodern Critic

April 19th 2009 01:47
Lilla,

Why don*t you mind your own business.

I find this line works better if it's at the end of a comment, though it only comes across as contradictory if you actually ask your addressee for their opinion somewhere in there.

Yes, I think declining to perform a medical procedure on someone because they are likely to endanger themselves again is mean. It's a surgeon's job to help those who need help. Maybe after a while the person whose life they saved will realise that they need to quit. Giving up on people is not a god idea.

I doubt anyone could mistake us as *on the same page.*

Yes, it should be easy to pick up that I am not mean, ignorant, homophobic, cranky, or a spelling-challenged.

I find it extremely offensive to call an extra obese person 'gluttonous', not least of all because 'gluttony' is one of the 'seven deadly sins' of the religion you subscribe to. I am also offended by Fog's 'elephant' and Gaye's 'fat', but at least he isn't suggesting that you will burn in hell if you're extra obese.

I never said that being extra obese is not a problem, I was offended by your choice of wording, which makes it plain to see that you're disinterested in helping this group of people. You can't help other people by insulting them, that just brings about bad vibes. People will be too busy feeling hurt by your abhorrent sense of humour to actually derive anything useful from you. If these people knew how to be healthy, they wouldn't be extra obese, so in order for them to change they need healthy, positive encouragement from people who are genuinely concerned. But you're too busy selfishly making fun of these poor people who don't know any better to offer something remotely like that, aren't you?

I think this move sends out a positive shock wave of empowerment to overwight people everywhere.

No, it doesn't. It's neither likely to prevent or encourage extra obesity, because I assume the language used to describe or enforce it is not emotive. If United directed affected passengers to empowering information on leading a healthy lifestyle, then it would be making a difference.

A disease is something which is passed on from one person to the next, which extra obesity is not.

If you actually want to be a responsible social (critic) commentator, you should try to develop a social conscience.

don't try to gag me

I've never tried to censor your comments in any way. Your defensiveness instead reveals a deep insecurity about the quality of your comment(s).

I notice that you never addressed my remark that extremely overweight people are stigmatised in our society at all, which is the issue I was actually talking about. And you're calling me a hypocrite, puerile and childish. Clearly, these things describe you instead.

LHM - Without a statement that the content on your blog is copyrighted by you, it doesn't belong to you but to Orble.

I wish you wouldn't mess your pretty little head by reading (much less trying to make sense of) my posts.

And if you insist on mentioning me at all, I suggest you very your (boring and ineffective) insults. i.e. You've used 'Post Menstrual Critic' already. As amusing as it is that you think I want to sleep with you, that's already been exhausted also.

Have a nice day, you perverted, misogynistic hack, until Jon bans you from the network after reading a post I copied and pasted from your blog, and unfortunately for you, gave you full credit for. Hint: You were inviting deletion.

Mistersmith - How dare I question your right to make fun of people! You poor thing, suffering from having to be nice all the time! What was I thinking, what with trying to help people be considerate, enterprising social facilitators instead of feeling so low that they take it out on others? How dare I suggest that you are the biggest victim of your narrow-mindedness? What will the world come to if you actually see a need to be pleasant, fair and sweet?

Janet - Sorry about all this, but I felt I needed to respond as appropriate.

Comment by Postmodern Critic

April 19th 2009 01:54
I apologise for writing 'god' instead good, adding an extra 'a' in front of spelling-challenged, and spelling it 'very' instead of 'vary'. I may be tired, but at least I can recognise my own mistakes.

Comment by Cheryl J

April 19th 2009 02:30
I wish all airlines would do it! I don't care how un-PC it is. I wish they would do the same on trains. I'm tiny so without fail someone who is huge will sit next to me and I'm squashed for the whole trip. Actually, when I say they 'sit next to me' that's actually wrong. Most of the time they half sit on me because they just don't fit.

They say they're discriminated against well boo-hoo, go on a bloody diet. And before anyone says that many people are overweight due to medical conditions, that's just horsecrap. Only a small amount of people are overweight due to medical reasons like thyroid problems etc and it's a very small percentage. Most are fat because they eat too much. Simple. I'm being discriminated against by being forced to pay for a ticket and endure being squashed, half sat on and uncomfortable for an entire trip. If you have a genuine medical condition that causes you to be overweight then present a medical certificate to the airline to only have to pay for one seat. If they don't do it under those circumstances then, and only then, should it be seen as discrimination.

Tall people can choose to pay extra to sit in a certain section that gives extra leg room and you don't hear them whinging about it. And you really cannot help how tall you are.

Now if they would just bring in something that forces people of any size to wear deodorant before boarding any form of transport....ah, one can but dream.

If I've offended anyone, well lets see...I don't care *sticks tongue out in childish manner* So there. Years of being pinned into my seat unable to use my own armrest or even move in my own seat makes me a little cranky.

Comment by Janet Collins

April 19th 2009 02:51
Thanks for the continued comments everyone. I hadn't realised before now that everyone had such strong opinions on the subject.

Mistersmith: Thanks for dopping in. I thought Fog's comment was particularly funny too.

PM: You have every right to express and even defend your position if you want to so don't apologise. Everyone else is saying what they think, even though opinions differ immensely.

Cheryl: I agree that public transport is bad. The seats are really only made for petites like yourself, particularly on the buses. I am on the smaller side of average and if anyone even slightly larger than me sits beside me I am relegated to only three-quarters of my own seat. They don't have armrests either which means I can't do anything about it.

I don't know what basis they use for measuring a passenger seat anyway. It always seems to be on the smaller rather than the larger person's size.

Comment by Someone

April 19th 2009 03:46
I think everyone has overlooked a serious point here... They can kick you off a flight for being too fat. What is their policy on connecting flights? I can picture it now.

"Sorry, sir/madame, you are too fat to ride on this flight"

"But I'm on a tight schedule, I have a connecting flight to catch!"

"Sorry, fatty. Not our problem. You should have thought of that before you were born with a thyroid disorder!"

Do they distinguish between those with obesity caused by a legitimate medical cause and those who just eat a lot? Because I would think if you had a legitimate medical reason for being obese, then that would most definitely be discrimination, wouldn't it?

I was under the impression that obese people had to buy 2 seats anyway. I used to fly alot as a child, but for the most part got to sit with family and so never had to experience sitting next to an obese person in economy before. I do agree with Morgan. I am an inch or two over 6 foot, and the last 3 times I have flown I have had my legs rammed up against the seat in front of me. In fact, I have struggles with the people in front of me who try to crush my knees by putting their seats down, so I always push back against them.

As a side note, I have a question to ask: Does anyone ask the person behind them before they recline their chairs? I do every time, and without fail people seem surprised that I asked. I thought it was a matter of common courtesy?


Comment by Mountain Fog

April 19th 2009 05:36
I am also offended by Fog's 'elephant' and Gaye's 'fat', but at least he isn't suggesting that you will burn in hell if you're extra obese.

Now, if you read my whole comment, you will see Epiphanie, that I try to put a very serious point across about the obesity debate, which is being turned into yet another 'disease' of blame, like type 2 diabetes, which I see as a convenient way of government buck passing so as to avoid the necessary changes to law regarding food content etc, and the proper funding of heath programmes (gym classes) for those overweight.

I, in case you may have thought otherwise, am over weight myself, and it is a huge challengeto deal with, especially when financially desperate, along with my other health issues which I will not deal with in this open forum.

Frankly, sometimes I need to send up a sacred cow, to laugh at what angers me, or worries me, as a way to diffuse its emotional grip.

So, in closing, you dealt with my "elephant" comment, fair enough, but chose to ignore the positive serious content. That is far from being fair on your part, as you did not enquire why I would make fun of the situation, or if I, indeed, was suffering obesity myself.

By the way, I left a message ages ago to ring me if you wanted to go see a stage show a pal of mine wrote, but you didn't bother answering...

cheers

fog

Comment by Postmodern Critic

April 19th 2009 06:00
Hi Fog,

First of all, I did not receive your message... did you send it via Orble or my email? I have just checked my Orble messages and couldn't find it...

I already knew you were overweight from your 'mushy' comment (so am I, though thankfully I can still fit into an airline seat), but I was offended nevertheless by your use of 'elephant' (I now notice that you used 'fat' as well, which slipped through my radar the first time I read all of your comment). I think that you have internalised the stigma I was talking about earlier, and there's no need to insult yourself, you know? Be kind to yourself, and think positive - many people like you the way you are and just because you don't look like most people doesn't mean that your body is not appealing. I know lots of men and women who love BB (big beautiful) people. Everybody has different tastes so try to love and respect what you've got, because you're achieving marvelous things with it! =)

All the best,
Epiphanie

Comment by Someone

April 19th 2009 06:34
I don't mean to interrupt you two, but PoMoCritic, I don't think there is anything wrong with poking fun at yourself. I am overweight and I make fat jokes all the time. It doesn't damage my self esteem, it just means I have a sense of humor.

Comment by Postmodern Critic

April 19th 2009 06:44
Hi Someone -

It's one thing not to take yourself too seriously, it's quite another to degrade yourself. Nobody wants to be called 'fat' deep down inside, I believe.

Comment by Mountain Fog

April 19th 2009 08:00
Epiphanie,

oh, okay, sorry you didn't get the message, these things happen, in my case more often than not.

You are right of course, part of my self-deprecatory humour is an expression of a negative self view, but, it also actually reminds me, of what I feel I need to do about myself, when and if I can.

To make fun of someone else because they are fat etc, I do not agree with, except, on rare occasions, if they are well known to me and enjoy that kind of banter, which means we both know and love each other as we really are.

Orble is not a good place to attempt this, of course, typing comes across differently...

By the way, I actually prefer 'Rubenesque' women, (as did Rubens himself) but prefer my men to be fit-ish..

At the end of the day, it is how we treat each other and what our ideals are, that make us truly attractive. I've known gorgeous guys (and girls) who turn out to be utter twats and immediatley their physical attraction ceases to exist, I cannot see it anymore.

Anyhoo,
hope all is well otherwise..chat anon..

fog
(P.S. Apologies to Janet for my dialogue with Ephanie taking up so much space!)

Comment by colocountry

April 19th 2009 10:50
Janet,
Wow, you've stirred up a hornets nest with this one. Interesting that a minority clearly dont comprehend your role as fascilitator of debate on your site. In the main you have elicited a refreshingly eclectic set of views and have provoked intraspection from all who have visited, even if they didnt post a comment. Keep up the good work .
Col

Comment by alt_ed

April 19th 2009 12:55
Why not just charge everyone more, that is, put the standard airfare up. Then those people who do not require the extra room could be given a rebate on their travel; think what an incentive it would be to get a discount!!

Even if you are already slender, who doesn't like a sale?

If the airlines were serious about their patrons health, they could launch frequent losers clubs, for their frequent flyers. Each time you fly you could be weighed, and I you reach your goal weight they give you a free flight or something... seems that would be more socially responsibly than just saying "You're fat, pay more!"

Comment by alt_ed

April 19th 2009 13:00
P.s. can I just say I think the person in the picture accompanying this post is pregnant, and not overweight... are the airlines going to charge pregnant woman more too?

Comment by Journeywoman

April 19th 2009 13:39
... and the comments came full circle. Nice.

Comment by Janet Collins

April 19th 2009 19:22
Someone: I*m surprised your comment about the reclining seats didn't ignite more comment because I think people can be really rude they dismiss other people*s comfort and lay the seat right back. That is far worse than anyone being overweight. Thanks for bringing that one up.

Alt-ed: Glad you joined in and that's a pretty good idea all around. Wilson mentioned pregment women too very early on. Presumably their weight would be all out in front - not sideways - so they wouldn't encroach on another seat. Anyway, you can't fly after you reach a certain stage in the pregnancy anyway. Thank you.

Comment by Mistersmith

April 19th 2009 22:16
Ruby, I really do feel sorry for you.

Comment by Morgan Bell

April 19th 2009 23:30
i thought David and Teresa were the same person?
is David drinking his own mentral blood?
how many times is he going to roll out the same tired old lines and laugh at himself while everyone else yawns? (that was rhetorical David . . . ahem, i mean Teresa)
i like how hes pretending he actually has the opportunity to turn women down . . .

Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 19th 2009 23:48
One good rhetorical question deserves another.

When are you going to write something worth reading?

Comment by Lilla

April 20th 2009 00:33
PMC,

I feel like I am treading eggshells here by replying at all, as you are so highly strung and quick to grab your pitchfork, but I understand all thoroughbreds are highly strung, so am not holding that against you, okay. . however, E you have laid some pretty serious charges at my door sweetie . .

Yes, it should be easy to pick up that I am not mean, ignorant, homophobic, cranky, or a spelling-challenged.

No, but you are RUDE deary and way off base with all the above, well, I will give you that I am spelling challenged, but then I doubt you have been forced to immigrate to somewhere that doesn*t speak Engwish.

Now who is making it personal E? Hey Kettle, you ARE black too!

I might add that I have a very high IQ as well as a highly prized small waist, (which I have fought harder than the Biggest looser to gain back after having gone to a size 18 because of a very traumatic experience 12 years ago, which left me dead for several seconds) so, I guess ignorant is out too?

I won*t bore everyone one with the lowdown on how depression can make you overeat, and my heartfelt compassion for those who are *there* in its grips. Needless to say that once you become overweight it doesn*t stop there as the diabetes steps in and creates its own problems with thyroids /insulin and other body organs making it SO HARD TO COME BACK FROM THE EDGE with the demons of low self esteem riding your back!. My only advice is determination, antidepressants (for 6 months to kick start the engines) and a commitment to work out every day no matter how small the movements to start with and choose LIVE FOOD OVER DEAD WHENEVER YOU CAN.

E, I will ask questions wherever I like on a comment/blog, okay? I am curious.

In fact, I will make any comment or post as disjointed as I like on a blog, okay. As I said, please stop trying to gag or censure me on a blog, okay. I am not writing a thesis and you are not my professor. In fact you have the right to ignore me completely, as you have done for a long time now because you jumped to other misinformed conclusions about me, tar and feathering me with the brush of misconception. I won*t be offended if you do, honest.

So, to continue what I was saying before I rudely interrupted myself . . my typing skills are so much slower than my thinking ability and I humbly apologise if it offends anyones sensibilities and intellectual appreciation of our fine language. Its why I partly why I blog, to practice. Sorry, Engwish is my second language and I have always hoped that the substance of my rather mishappen, stumbling, incorrectly spelled and structured sentences make up for their grammatical and misspelt inaccuracy. At least (I note) that I have a good range of vocabulary compared to some, should we perhaps discuss their inferiority as well, or the fact that some people can say much more than others with only a few words. . But I digress … we were talking about obesity were we not?

As I said, (and repeat) I made the joke on your comment (mind seed). You actually thought of it, I gave it shape, and I notice that Foggily finished it off with great aplomb! Hahaha I love the idea of a flight a day that is for larger people, especially those who suffer from gluttony, depression, thyroid dysfunction and whatever.

Foggily; Fly Elephant Airlines, JUMBO CLASS?

A side note: No, I am not homophobic, as I said before each to their own behind closed doors and their final judgement day, nirvana, or karma as they please. I am not a religious fundamentalist. In fact, whilst on the subject and totally off Janet*s subject (sorry Janet but one must defend the charges laid at ones door if one is not to really be considered rude); two of my dearest friends are gay. Some are also mad too with certificates of sanity (perhaps something more people here on orble need [some time out in ward 12b perhaps]???). I have one dear friend who is a lesbian/bi. Worse : I have some FAT friends and a few OLD PEOPLE friends too. Ooh and one Jewish pal (oy vey); many wogs (like me), a black guy and heaven forbid, three really nice Islamic friends I have known for years (who may now be terrosists? Pah!). Three alcoholic friends, one druggie acquaintance, and a peculiar dope smoking, old hippy couple, time shifted from another era.

Gosh E, I even hang out with Christians, a Catholic (my best friend); Baptists and heaven forbid, a really special 7th day Adventist family. But mostly Buddhist Monks, spiritualists, ufo abductees, geologists, a couple native American Indians, an Aborigine; a gaggle of environmentalists and geologists, police and rescue people. . and not to mention my dear apocalyptic doomsday fanatic *family* of nutters I see whenever the planets do something wyrd. There are a few academics from acadamia in there too, as well as published authors, publishers, poets and a few school teachers . . but I don*t want to start bragging.

In fact, I don*t think I have had trouble hanging out with people until I came onto orble and met all the nice *NORMAL* people like you PMC?

Perhaps it is something to do with virtuality that makes people so NICE and NORMAL?

And, for the record : When I say disease, I am referring to the idea of it being spelt DIS ~ EASE and overeating (just like gambling, over drinking, drug addiction) is just such a thing. No peace, no balance, no perspective. Try reading a book called; Your Body Speaks Your Mind by Deb Shapiro, or grab some Louise Hay : You Can Heal Your Life. As a counselor in the real world, who actually goes out and helps people like You and Foggily and Someone (for real) to battle obesity (and these addictions); we discuss overweight problems, gluttony and emotional *hungry ghost* situations openly because overeating is usually a result of what we call *emotional padding* against the outrageous slings and arrows people feel from the outside world, but usually internatilised because of family and friends. Feelings of victimization, of loosing control, of not having any personal power left to say NO.

Those threatened because of childhood trauma or bad marriages, or feeling endangered by the *end of times* or nuclear war perhaps, or nihilistic tendencies of no heaven, God, afterlife, or karmic meaning to life itself? Some through past life memories (who need regressing), financial investments that went wrong, failed business, incest resulting in depression and melancholy, loss of family etc . . but nearly ALWAYS because of deep sensitivities that are not being realised, met or adressed by the proper conditions needed to help clear them. Emotions that are not being HEALED because of the rage that holds the person prisoner, stuck fast, unable to progress. Often because of the inability to look at themselves or accept the thing that has happened. My job as an energy healer is to budge them onwards by helping them recognise where they are stuck. But I won*t bore you with the joy my work offers me in helping people heal their problems, as you probably have your own joy from your own work to keep you happy.

Foggily, Someone, PMC

I can only pass on my personal experience, and I survive the fast paced hectic lifestyle by choosing Live over Dead without exception when I am out and about, AND without any bread. It doesn*t matter if you eat twice as much this way, just make it live over dead and don*t add Bread! You will loose weight. Also, just stop eating wheat/bread and drinking soft drinks and more than one cup of coffee altogether in or out!. Try decaff coffee. I lost two dress sizes this way and one more by adding a 30 minute workout three times a week. I am older than you guys and it took longer, but in one year I have dropped three sizes. I don*t know what that equates to in Kilos as I found weighing myself regularly was too depressing as a female gains weight each month anyway.

Some may argue that it costs more to eat LIVE over DEAD and no BREAD, but then does it? In the long run I have noticed that most people loose their health to gain their wealth and then have to spend that wealth in the latter years to regain their health. It seems silly to me.

As for the airline problem?

God knows what they*ll do. . . no wait a minute, they have already done it. It costs money to lift weight off the ground, I guess that is the bottom line (pardon the pun) and I doubt it is personal. *Fatties pay more* is the message and whilst it may seem harsh, I do think it will start the necessary furor needed to address the situation and as I (and others have said) perhaps discounts for the skinny people will be the better incentive after all the liable and litigation this bold new move will obviously cause, (judging by the response here on this blog, which could be seen as the microcosm of the larger world view?).

It probably won*t matter in three years anyway, fat or thin.

Lilla . .




Comment by Morgan Bell

April 20th 2009 00:52
David,
when are you going to stop obsessing over the blogs you consider to be not worth reading?
apparently theres over 7,000 blogs on this network yet you just cant seem to get past mine . . . sometimes youre even the first comment . . . i hope your overwhelming procession of "lady-friends" dont mind when you staple my display pic to their forehead in order to get aroused

Comment by Lilla

April 20th 2009 00:53
David,

Thank you for your earlier comment.

There truly are some nutcases on Orble. Half of them take offence at a compliment.

*slapping forehead*

unbelievable!

Lilla . .

Comment by Lilla

April 20th 2009 00:55
hahahaha Alt_ed,

I am envisioning having to jump up onto the scales now after my luggage to see if I qualify for my discount points for the next flight!

Bravo, this is such a comedy sketch, the stuff great shows like Saturday Night Live and Big Girls Bra was made off (and its predecessor . . I have a mental block on its name).

I often see life in this way (daily actually) . . comedy sketches everywhere!

Lilla ..


Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 20th 2009 01:01
Morgan,

Does it bother you that Teresa exists?

Comment by alt_ed

April 20th 2009 01:41
haha Lilla...

I am envisioning having to jump up onto the scales now after my luggage to see if I qualify for my discount points for the next flight!

That's what makes my plan so good; they already have the scales!

Of course, it would be your choice to jump on after your luggage and see if your slender waist is enough to get you over the discount line

Comment by Lilla

April 20th 2009 04:06
Ed,

What excitment I would have queing up.. can you imagine it, all the passengers waiting to *jump on* to see if they qualify for their Lite Flight Points?

Great incentive indeed!

Ps Fast Forward was the comedy show I was thinking of.. a perfect take off *pardon the pun*


Comment by alt_ed

April 20th 2009 04:12
I wonder if I could fly for free? I only take up half a seat as it is! hehe

Comment by Postmodern Critic

April 20th 2009 05:16
Lilla,

I am completely at a loss as to how you have construed my comments as designed to 'gag' you. I will passionately defend your right to voice your or anybody else's opinion, no matter how strongly I may disagree with said opinion. I am an activist for non-totalitarianism and democracy, having experienced Communism first-hand through growing up in Bulgaria until the age of seven (if we're going to get into our personal histories).

Oops, I have to go now, but to your insistence that I stop trying to censor you, I say: ... Huh?

Will get back to you later.

Comment by Morgan Bell

April 20th 2009 05:54
David,
you are your alternate gender personas can exist all you like, but that doesnt mean you have a right to bully anyone else out of existance

Comment by alt_ed

April 20th 2009 07:26
God, talk about fertilising the old Hypocrisy tree there Lady Dave.

I guess you could take a spoon full (or more!) of your own medicine and harden the fuck up!

Don't preach about what you don't know, it just makes you seem like the desperate popular jock, who sadly, never had the insight the realise that being a nasty jerk out side of the school yard has little appeal to women.

Why how I am fascinated by a man posing as a woman, posing as a man who is a woman... now I'm confused, which one of us is meant to be gay?

I much prefer it when you attack me forthrightly instead of getting Ed to do your dirty work for me.
David is this a riddle? Why on earth would I support you with anything; other than your plight to be euthanised that is.

As I said, grow up David. Stop masquerading as a child, and start acting like the man you so proudly claim to be.

Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 20th 2009 07:31
Ed,

I was wondering when you'd come back on Orble to do Morgan's dirty work for her. Are you over Jon's little telling off?

Comment by alt_ed

April 20th 2009 07:34
Dave, you should by now, from our extensive telephone conversations (including "Did you get home safe?" and "I'm watching Natural Born Killers") be well aware that I am my own person.

If you make mention of me in a comment, I will respond!


Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 20th 2009 07:43
Ruby,

You need to learn to read. It's that simple.

Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 20th 2009 07:45
Ed,

I've read a lot of comments on the net about how guys are internet experts.

I don't believe any of them. They're heroes in their own hard-drives.

You just confirmed my opinon of you.

Comment by RubySoho

April 20th 2009 07:49
David,

you are a condescending prick. It's that simple.

Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 20th 2009 07:49
The most amusing part of this post?

While you're all attacking me, you're not writing any posts.

Think about your Karma.

Comment by alt_ed

April 20th 2009 07:54
Please direct all Alt_ed related complaints to,

The Alt_ed Opinion Complaints Department on:

61 418 818 876

Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 20th 2009 07:56
Thanks Ed.

Now I have a link to tell the police about. I was waiting for that. Please stay on Orble. The police have great technology.

Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 20th 2009 07:58
Oh I love copy and paste. Thanks again Ed. Like I said. I've been waiting for you to come clean about this for so long. Thanks again.

Comment by RubySoho

April 20th 2009 07:58
Actually I just wrote a post today. And it's on the home page. You are welcome to comment. it's right up your alley.


p.s karma points have more to do with how much you comment, not how much you post. you need to learn to Orble. it's that simple.

Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 20th 2009 07:59
Expect a visit Ed.

I think you just crossed the line on technology. But thanks mate. YOu just did me the biggest favour.

Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 20th 2009 08:01
Oooh Ruby. How hurtful. I learnt to Orble before you joined. Look at this post and how much you three are revved up. I mean come on. You think this means anything to me. I'm just sitting here laughing about how none of you are posting.

Comment by RubySoho

April 20th 2009 08:01
This is really too much. Poor Janet.

Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 20th 2009 08:04
Oh come on. Janet will love it.

She'll have something to read when she gets home.

Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 20th 2009 08:06
Ed's trying to work out how to get through my firewall. He really is a nasty piece of work.

Comment by alt_ed

April 20th 2009 08:06

Comment by alt_ed

April 20th 2009 08:07
Do postie bikes come with a firewall? I thought that was more a 'car' thing...

Comment by RubySoho

April 20th 2009 08:07
How revved up i am? Like i said, I didn't even direct any comments at you until you mentioned my name repeatedly. I don't know what is going on with you and alt_ed and i don't want to know. Just because he and I converse on here a lot does not mean we are interchangeable.


But thanks for rekindling my desire to post more often. I thought i had lost it for good.

Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 20th 2009 09:44
Orble is the funniest site.

You can rev people up with a few words.

And then they spend the rest of the day justifying their own sanctity.


Comment by Morgan Bell

April 20th 2009 09:49
David,
we all know youre a prick, there was really no need to clarify . . . am i a pricktease because i laugh at you and youre a prick?

People who align themselves with the gay community go on and on and on about how the world is against their version of sex, and yet you sit on Orble going sick straight sex is bad??? I mean where do you get off?

the problem with you David is that you cant read properly . . . where did i ever say straight sex is bad?
also, are you really going to sit here and deny that you have created female personas on Orble?
you seem so stunned that there are people on Orble, other than me, that think you are a bit of a boring loser, a bit of a pest, a bit of a hostile reject . . . almost everyone thinks it David . . . it has nothing to do with me "controlling" people, it has to do with you being rude to them, thats why people dont like you
ive answered everything youve said to me directly
it is you that insists on drawing other people into conflicts by insulting them, if you address people by name its not really that surprising that they would respond
theres no fool like an old fool

Comment by Lady Henrietta Muddling

April 20th 2009 10:05
Morgan

hehehe

That's about all your comment deserves. I know you love it when Normie Smormie says hehehe and calls you Morgie Smorgie but I'm not Norm.

How many times do I have to tell you, write something worthy of reading and you'll get a serious response?

Stop this Cathy Freeman impersonation. All she ever does is giggle. Hehehe

Comment by Carolyn Cordon

April 20th 2009 10:11

Comment by alt_ed

April 20th 2009 10:33
Putrid and sterile eh... is that similar to the darkness of daylight?

Comment by RubySoho

April 20th 2009 11:18
Sorry Janet. I don't think any of us would be offended if you deleted the whole lot.

Comment by alt_ed

April 20th 2009 11:24
No Janet, you have to leave the 'evidence' there for David's law suit... he's going to 'sue' the pants of me with his highly-underpaid legal aid lawyer!

Comment by Morgan Bell

April 20th 2009 11:50
David,
could you be any more jealous of Norm?
at least hes a human being . . .
for the millionth time David, i am not seeking a serious response from you, i am not seeking any response
i dont need an endorsement from Pauline Hanson and i certainly dont need one from you or any of your other female personas



hi Janet,
sorry about all this, but once your sexuality and vagina are brought into things its a little hard to ignore

Comment by Mau-Medellin

April 20th 2009 11:57
Fat people can be so belligerent... especially when it comes to air travel.

Comment by Janet Collins

April 20th 2009 12:52
Mau-Medelin: Are you saying that obese people are aggressive? I have found them to be quite the reverse but we are all entitled to our opinion.

Thank you for stopping by.

Comment by Mau-Medellin

April 20th 2009 12:56
Janet Collins: That is exactly what I'm saying. I worked as a Hostie for an Australian airline, and larger people where always very rude, and often uncompromising.

Comment by Janet Collins

April 20th 2009 13:09
Mau-Medellin: I take it back then. Obviously, first-hand experience is more evidence than my experience which has actually been from the sidelines.

Thanks for that.

Comment by Mau-Medellin

April 20th 2009 13:22
Janet Collins: Only to happy to help.

Comment by Anonymous

April 20th 2009 18:30
I can't even remember how I came across this post -- I was interested because last week I had the "squashed against the window" experience and wasn't too happy about it. (Fortunately, a short flight.)
I see a few serious comments, then lots of vitriol and worse. Can't you just blacklist these people so this can be a serious conversation? (I'm also amazed at the amount of time some of you seem to spend here!) Okay, I'll leave you to it. Abuse me all you like, because as soon as I post this, I'll be gone for good. Sorry they're ruining your blog, Janet.

Comment by Janet Collins

April 20th 2009 22:51
Thanks Anon. Glad you were only squashed for a short time.

Comment by Randy Inman

April 20th 2009 23:32
They would probably just stick my fat butt in a cargo hold.

Comment by Janet Collins

April 20th 2009 23:49
Randy,

Would that excuse you from paying for two tickets?

Comment by RubySoho

April 22nd 2009 11:59
Yes, i know the term 'jiggy with it' is passe. That's the point. I was using the term ironically. As in yours and David's attempts to be cool and subversive are as lame as saying 'jiggy with it'. And I'm not white.

I have no problem with sexual desire and intimacy. I do roll my eyes at comments which are used for no other reason than their shock value. You really didn't have anything to say with that comment. You just wanted to sound cool. But you didn't. Are you jiggy with that?


Comment by Mistersmith

April 22nd 2009 15:38
Just repeating the question foremost in my mind Ruby. Please tell me: What is 'poor taste'?

Comment by Mrs M

April 23rd 2009 02:34
Okay Janet,

I actually have a comment on your post

Well no-one in my family is overweight but Mr M is 6 foot 3 inches.

We have been on long haul flights since having kids because as much as I know it would inconvenience other passengers I myself couldn't imagine having to deal with a crying baby. So I wait until they grow up a bit. But it's hard. It does affect my decision to travel. Sometimes it does bother me that people roll their eyes at me when they see I have children.

But having said all that, I am very conscious of having children with me and sometimes feel like a bit of a leper on the plane. I always asked to be seated right at the back.

Also, sometimes we just need to realise that we are on public transport so some inconvenience should be expected. So the question to be asked is, what is reasonable inconvenience? A fellow passenger leaning on my armrest? A child who whinges for 30 minutes? Two people talking a little loud?

These are inconveniences. Obesity is a real issue.

I'm not out to ostracize anyone but we can't tip toe around the subject of obesity. Ignore it and it will go away? Hardly. Ignore it and they will die.

We all need to take responsibility for ourselves. It's a sticky one. We don't know the circumstances in which a person is obese. Self harm or medical.

But I have seen some parents feed their children shocking diets and then just say that they are big boned.

I don't know what the answer is.

Cinema's have Mother's and Baby's screenings and also some have built crying rooms that are sound proof.

Fitting out planes might be a bit more difficult but shouldn't be dismissed.

Love & stuff
Mrs M

Comment by Janet Collins

April 23rd 2009 07:11
Mrs M

Another interesting read. Using the shared armrest - I'd forgotten about that one but it often really irritates me that a person next to me hogs that without question.

I do also feel sorry for parents with young children but some babies - and children - cry and whinge more than others and over a long period can be quite unsettling. Even if people are against using dummies, I think they should make an exception on long haul travel.

Thanks again!

Comment by Mrs M

April 23rd 2009 07:53
I just re-read my comment and it was meant to say that we HAVEN'T been on long haul flights since having kids.

I think it's a bit of wishful thinking obviously coming through.

I feel sorry to parents with crying babies. Which is why I don't do it to myself. I would be stressing about fellow passengers, about the baby, about the lack of sleep I'm getting. It's just too much.

The balance is to not put too much emphasis on the comfort of others at the expense of my own, I suppose. That's an issue for everyone really.

Who out there snores when they sleep. Or talk or grind their teeth?

I do think parents need to prepare themselves if they are going on a long haul flight to calm a baby by any means necessary. Dummy...brandy

For the baby and me.

Love & stuff
Mrs M

Comment by Mistersmith

April 23rd 2009 08:04
Ruby, I don't have to try to sound cool. I am cool.
But do you have an answer yet to my question:
What is bad taste?

Comment by Morgan Bell

April 23rd 2009 08:19
David, give it a rest already
Janet has made it clear she doesnt want any more bickering on her posts, have a bit of respect
besides, youre having a bit of a one way conversation, Ruby hasnt responded since the last time you addressed her

Comment by Janet Collins

April 23rd 2009 08:28
Mrs M

Hahaha! The old brandy trick.!!

Comment by Mistersmith

April 23rd 2009 13:20
Morgan - stop calling me David. My name's Teresa.

Comment by Morgan Bell

April 23rd 2009 17:40

Comment by Lilla

April 24th 2009 01:25
Janet,

Mrs M has reminded me of a flight I took From Canberra to Perth a few years ago when my little one was only about 2 years old. Her first flight, she absolutely screamed after the first hour or so and wanted nothing but to climb under the seat in front.

The captain announced our decent into Perth, and ooh heck she began twisting and writhing (as they do) to get herself free of my lap and arms, in order to get down onto the ground under that seat. There was nothing I could do with her.

I must say that although my response was unorthodox, it worked a charm and all ended happily, so I thought i*d pass it on (may do a post on it later too actually), but the thing is;

I let her climb under the seat in the end and put my bag in front of her so that the air crew stewardesses couldn*t see her *sticking out* and we landed with her under there, as quiet as a sleeping baby!

Many years on, herself now 13 and a seasoned traveller having jet setted about with us all and by herself to Hobart last year, I asked her if she could remember anything about her very first flight and how much she hated it?

Her response was to say; "I can remember the noise of the engines . . this humming sound and ... um ... a handbag?"

Gotta love those kids.

Lilla . .

Comment by Mrs M

April 24th 2009 06:08
Airline hostie once told me that babies always fall asleep on descent.

She's proven to be right every time.

Love & stuff
Mrs M

Comment by Janet Collins

April 24th 2009 06:13
Lilla

It is always amazing what we do remember isn't it?

Comment by Janet Collins

April 24th 2009 06:15
Mrs M

The little tricksters! They just know the plane trip is nearly over so there it's no longer necessary to make a nuisance of themselves

Comment by Postmodern Critic

April 25th 2009 22:57
Lilla - Sure.

Mistersmith - You're just mad at me because David got banned... and if you want to follow in his footsteps, you're making a good start.

Comment by Postmodern Critic

April 26th 2009 03:07
Lilla - Allow me to make a suggestion: We transfer this discussion to the blog I have set up for discussions of anti-discrimination, PADSOC.com. I believe it would be a good host for further discussion between us since a) you believe I am discriminating against you by trying to silence you (or something), and b) I believe you are discriminating against extra-obese people and homosexuals. Either way, we can only learn something about ourselves and each other from this discussion. What do you think?

Comment by Lilla

April 26th 2009 23:03
Sounds intersting PMC, and will help your ratings too hopefuly.

I*d enjoy that (now that Janet has cleaned up the messier elements of our last few comments by taking away our angry gauntlets). I Believe we can discuss it amicably and to tell the truth enjoy nothing more than a good adult conversation. It sounds reasonable to me, I agree.

I will go over there, but please be advised my time is very limited and quite expensive in the real world, so my commenting may be a little sporadic, albeit, constant. But not evasive, okay? I really do enjoy conversation of a high order, but I do like time to think too.

Let me know Here what you will call the post, so I can find it without too much searching.

Thank you, C U on Padsoc.

Lilla . .

Comment by Morgan Bell

April 26th 2009 23:36
For starters, I haven't been banned. I just don't use Harry in a Potter any more.

hahaha that was gold!

Comment by Mistersmith

April 27th 2009 00:31
Hahahaha! Lol and all those netspeak terms.

Poor Morgan. She just can't get rid of me. Try as she might. The poor little thing. A day ago she was finished with me, and telling me I was baiting her. Boy she loves accusing people of her own faults.

I'll write it again Morgan. Keep going. I love the real you coming out on Orble.

Other people aren't half as dumb or unperceptive as you think they are..

Comment by Morgan Bell

April 27th 2009 00:47
i love you too David

i love how manly you are when you choose to discard Lady Henrietta as a login, preferring to push Teresa out of Mistersmith, all for miscellaneous reasons that could only make sense to a Great Mind

i love how on the one post here Mistersmith has denied being David and then gloated about being David

but most of all i like how completely devoid of logic you are, expecting everyone to keep up with your plethora of personas when even you cant

i said i wouldnt be visiting your blog again, and i will keep that promise, but ill visit Janet as often as i like

i wonder if you will be as entertaining once the blood starts rushing to your head again?

Comment by Mistersmith

April 27th 2009 05:31
hehehe morgie smorgie lol

lol lol and double lol morgie lollol hehehe

Comment by Morgan Bell

April 27th 2009 05:39
sounds like its still hard, dont get too light-headed

Comment by Postmodern Critic

May 2nd 2009 03:05
Lilla - Reviewing your hateful comments again, I realised that I've already said what I wanted to say, and can't really be bothered hearing what you come up with in response. I won't be networking much on Orble any more, so I can only hope you learn to stop hating yourself and others.

Comment by Lilla

May 3rd 2009 00:22
Thanks E, so do I, although anger is perhaps closer to the truth than *hate* It doesn*t go there sweetie, not by a long shot.

.. I would add that I also sincerely hope you manage to shed those unwanted kilo*s with ease.

Good luck in all your endeavours.

Lilla ..

Comment by Cheryl J

May 4th 2009 09:54
Well to be very unPC, I flew from Melbourne to Sydney this morning with some very unseemly rolls of fat that escaped their owners seat, crept over (and under) the armrest like a plague and invaded my already small seat space grrrrrrr!

I think I was sat next to the marshmallow giant from Ghostbusters!

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
378 Posts dating from November 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Janet Collins's Blogs

5579 Vote(s)
238 Comment(s)
32 Post(s)
144 Vote(s)
1 Comment(s)
1 Post(s)
Moderated by Janet Collins
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]